The purpose of the evaluation was to determine the effectiveness of the teaching/
learning situation as it involved the cited programs and to determine the effectiveness
of the materials themselves with reference to the particular group of students with
whom they were being used, namely students of English as a Second Language, more info about this you can find here https://customwriting.com/.
The report by the Bureau of Educational Research had included experimental
data based on the Metropolitan, Clymer-Barrett, and Linguistic Capacity Index Tests
and the results were either non-significant or favored the control group.
Since there is doubt that these tests should be used with non-native speakers of
English because of the linguistic problems involved, it was decided that no normalized instruments would be used during the second year of the evaluation. This was coupled with a request from the Acting Assistant Director, Bureau of English in charge of ESL and Bilingual Programs (at the request of the Project Coordinators and the teachers involved in each project) to the District Superintendents that the students involved in both the Merrill and Miami projects be omitted from the Metropolitan Reading Tests.
This is not to suggest that no information could be obtained from such tests as the
Metropolitan Reading Test. On the contrary, it is believed that pertinent data will be
forthcoming from comparing the scores of those students with similar groups that have preceded or studied concurrently with them but who have used other materials. The problem, however, is one of timing. The NYU evaluating team believes that it would be much less frustrating to the children involved and much more meaningful in general if such comparisons were made at the completion of the projects when the non-native speakers would have had at least three years of exposure to English and would have completed the whole course of study.
Good Article